Two professors wrote that although it has been argued Trump's order is at odds with language in the 14th Amendment, there could be more nuance to the issue.
A constitutional law professor weighs in on the legal battles sparked by President Donald Trump’s controversial executive ...
In a recent New York Times op ed, legal scholars Randy Barnett and Ilan Wurman offer a partial defense of President Trump's executive order denying ...
President Donald Trump's administration says it’s appealing a Maryland federal judge’s ruling that blocks the president’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for people whose parents ...
Two law professor argued in a guest essay for The New York Times that President Donald Trump may hold a strong case on the ...
The president’s insistence that the U.S. is the “only country in the world” to provide birthright citizenship is flatly wrong. Most countries in the Western Hemisphere do so. More to the point: No ...
The president's executive orders have already drawn dozens of legal challenges, including some that could make it to the U.S.
On his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order that purports to end birthright citizenship for certain ...
The court in 1898 ruled that the protections and guarantees afforded by the 14th Amendment belong to citizens and noncitizens ...
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, after the Civil War, with the intention of granting full citizenship rights to freed African American slaves; its birthright citizenship clause has since been ...
President Donald Trump’s recent executive order attacking birthright citizenship has reinvigorated the debate surrounding the ...
Anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen at birth, guaranteed by the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause. That clause wouldn't be ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results