The Supreme Court on Friday upheld Congress’s ban on TikTok, marking the end of the popular video-sharing platform’s presence in the United States.

In Trump’s first term, Meta quietly introduced a slew of Republican-friendly changes. But led by Joel Kaplan, the company is done playing both sides and is going all-in on MAGA.

In a town hall, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company remains committed to diversity and free expression after unwinding DEI programs

Since the 1970s, the US Supreme Court has defended a very broad conception of freedom of speech, one that allows today Elon Musk's or Mark Zuckerberg's platforms to massively disseminate unverified or even deliberately false information.

Less than two months before Mark Zuckerberg announced Meta would be axing its diversity, equity and inclusion program, he assured Trump adviser Stephen Miller that he would not get in the way of the president-elect’s agenda.

TikTok users blamed Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg for TikTok going dark in the US overnight.

Meta has agreed to pay $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the company after it suspended his accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, AP sources said.

President Donald Trump's first days in office already offer signals about how his next four years in the White House may unfold.

Trump wants a Constitution that, among other things, allows him to refuse to spend congressional appropriations and as we’ve discussed, unilaterally deny citizenship to certain people born in the United States, against the clear direction of the Constitution.

When the Supreme Court upheld a law that banned TikTok from the US, it seemed well aware that its ruling could resonate far beyond one app. The justices delivered an unsigned opinion with a quote from Justice Felix Frankfurter from 1944: “in considering the application of established legal rules to the ‘totally new problems’ raised by the airplane and radio,

Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of a federal law that bans the distribution of TikTok in the United States unless and until it is sold to a new owner. The Court upheld the law after applying a remarkably deferential version of the intermediate scrutiny standard that courts apply in First Amendment cases to content-neutral regulations of speech.